There was a report that 10000 cats have been eaten by people everyday in Gunagdong province. Some people think cats could be eaten because it is legal, no law prohibit it. But some people consider cats could not be eaten because it is not moral, cats still have life and thinking, they are pet friends of human beings. What is your opinion?

In addition, how do you think of snake, rabbit, dog, bird, donkey... do they could be eaten? and have you ever eaten? or have you ever taken them as pet friends?

Anyway different opinions decide diverse argument. What do you think of this question? How you will analyze it? It must be a good chance to show us your arguments on Friday.

very good

Wow, Jenny, this kind of expression is pretty useful.

Actually I suggest that every attendant could have some preparation which will help each other improve a lot, meanwhile avoid embarrassments from just keeping silence and staring others.

Hope we will have a nice time.

Pet or Foods? Who can decide it? Who is the master? We are quite illogical when we try to decide what can be eaten and what cannot be eaten.

Foods is critical because we could hardly be survival without foods. We have been brought up to eat certain foods, sometimes eating unusually to show our own exaggeration.

The person eating one's pet is the person who never has his own pet.
The person having his own pet would never be able to chose his pet as foods.

These is no border against PET and FOODS. The ruler is just in everyone's mind.

It means it could only be decided by yourself what Pet is and What Foods is.